Virtual self-care simulations for third-year pharmacy skills laboratory courses in three institutions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether a virtual, self-care activity improved knowledge and confidence in third-year student pharmacists. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Third-year student pharmacists (n = 386) from three institutions participated in the virtual self-care simulation during their respective practice laboratory course. A pre- and post-assessment collected 10 knowledge and five confidence questions, self-reported on 0-100 scale, mapped to learning outcomes and pharmacy standards. Responses for participants who provided consent and had linked assessments were analyzed. Additionally, students participated in a perception assessment following the simulation with the post-assessment. Each knowledge question was scored as binary (correct/incorrect), presented as percentage, and significance identified with a McNemar's test. Total knowledge score and confidence changes were presented as means with standard deviations and significance with a paired t-test. Student perceptions were presented as frequencies and percentages. FINDINGS: Total knowledge assessment demonstrated a significant improvement (p < 0.001) for the entire cohort of 198 study participants. Upon additional analysis, a single institution led the cohort to significant increase, with variable improvement and significance for each individual question. Confidence improved for the entire cohort of students and at each institution individually. The students perceived the virtual self-care activity favorably. SUMMARY: The third-year student virtual self-care activity improved knowledge and confidence with varying significance between institutions. Future studies will focus on the impact of continued reinforcement of self-care activities on student growth in knowledge and confidence.

An active-learning laboratory focused on critical care topics.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe an active-learning laboratory on critical care topics including advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), rapid sequence intubation (RSI), and toxicology and its effect on students' knowledge, skills, and confidence. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Third year pharmacy students (n = 88) participated in a critical care focused laboratory with four stations focused on ACLS review, ABBOJECTⓇ syringe assembly, ACLS simulations, RSI cases, and toxicology. Prior to the critical care focused skills laboratory, students completed an optional assessment composed of six confidence and eight knowledge questions. After the laboratory, students completed the same confidence and knowledge assessment. Descriptive statistics assessed pre/post-assessment responses. Paired pre/post-assessment Likert data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired pre/post-test multiple choice responses were analyzed using the McNemar test. FINDINGS: Of the 88 students in the cohort, 76 students completed both the pre/post-assessments (response rate: 86.4%). Students demonstrated a significant increase in their overall knowledge and confidence scores on the post-assessment. All students successfully assembled an ABBOJECTⓇ syringe. The majority of respondents rated the critical care laboratory as excellent or good with regards to how enjoyable and effective the activity was to help understand critical care topics. SUMMARY: A hands-on, active-learning laboratory devoted to teaching and reinforcing common critical care concepts allowed students to gain knowledge and confidence regarding ACLS, RSI, and toxicology.

Optimizing pharmacogenomic decision-making by data science.

Healthcare systems have made rapid progress towards combining data science with precision medicine, particularly in pharmacogenomics. With the lack of predictability in medication effectiveness from patient to patient, acquiring the specifics of their genotype would be highly advantageous for patient treatment. Genotype-guided dosing adjustment improves clinical decision-making and helps optimize doses to deliver medications with greater efficacy and within safe margins. Current databases demand extensive effort to locate relevant genetic dosing information. To address this problem, Patient Optimization Pharmacogenomics (POPGx) was constructed. The objective of this paper is to describe the development of POPGx, a tool to simplify the approach for healthcare providers to determine pharmacogenomic dosing recommendations for patients taking multiple medications. Additionally, this tool educates patients on how their allele variations may impact gene function in case they need further healthcare consultations. POPGx was created on Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME). KNIME is a modular environment that allows users to conduct code-free data analysis. The POPGx workflow can access Clinical Pharmacogenomics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines and subsequently be able to present relevant dosing and counseling information. A KNIME representational state transfer (REST) application program interface (API) node was established to retrieve information from CPIC and drugs that are exclusively metabolized through CYP450, and these drugs were processed simultaneously to demonstrate competency of the workflow. The POPGx program provides a time-efficient method for users to retrieve relevant, patient-specific medication selection and dosing recommendations. Users input metabolizer gene, genetic allele data, and medication list to retrieve clear dosing information. The program is automated to display current guideline recommendations from CPIC. The integration of this program into healthcare systems has the potential to revolutionize patient care by giving healthcare practitioners an easy way to prescribe medications with greater efficacy and safety by utilizing the latest advancements in the field of pharmacogenomics.

Skills laboratory faculty job satisfaction: Effects of high-contact teaching and the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to describe the workload responsibilities and job satisfaction of skills laboratory faculty, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: School of pharmacy (SOP) skills laboratory faculty were surveyed in fall 2021 to gather information on workload responsibilities and job satisfaction, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Quantitative data were reported using descriptive statistics and, when appropriate, student t-tests were used to compare responses from before and during COVID-19. Qualitative data were coded for themes by two investigators with a third investigator used to reach consensus. RESULTS: A total of 45 skills laboratory faculty from 44 of 142 SOP responded to the survey. Faculty reported an average percent effort of 43.9% laboratory teaching, 13.9% non-laboratory teaching, 12.8% service, 6.5% administration, 12.5% patient care, and 10.4% scholarship. Overall job satisfaction decreased from before COVID-19 to during COVID-19, and faculty members' satisfaction specifically with their laboratory role decreased from 7.5 to 6.6 (P = .003). Several themes were identified when respondents described what they loved most about teaching in the laboratory as well as the challenges associated, the majority of which were personnel, resources, and time. CONCLUSIONS: Skills laboratory faculty reported a high number of laboratory courses coordinated each year along with many hours dedicated each week to prepare and conduct skills laboratory activities. While the pandemic is over, the unique aspects of coordinating student-centered courses likely requires more support for skills laboratory faculty members to avoid burnout and improve job satisfaction.

A comparison of in-person vs. asynchronous learning with self-care patient cases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a live laboratory setting compared to an asynchronous session in a crossover teaching design on knowledge and confidence in self-care review topics. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Pharmacy students (n = 88) participated in a crossover designed laboratory session where they either attended a live, active-learning laboratory session on self-care review topics, followed by a virtual, asynchronous self-care simulation or vice versa. Sessions were held one week apart. Pre- and post-assessments were administered that contained knowledge and confidence questions as well as student perceptions on the teaching modalities. FINDINGS: Of the 88 students who participated in the study, 67 (76.1%) were included in the study findings. Post-assessment knowledge and confidence significantly increased after both the live, active-learning session and the asynchronous simulation. The majority of students (85%) indicated that they preferred the in-person activity. SUMMARY: Students preferred the live, active-learning laboratory for reviewing self-care concepts. However, knowledge and confidence improved using either teaching modality, therefore, in institutions where resources are limited, the virtual, asynchronous activity may be useful especially if facilitators and/or budget are limited.

A lot in a little: Assessment of skills laboratory course structures and faculty workloads.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacy skills development is essential to pharmacy programs to ensure "practice-ready" graduates. The objective was to describe the landscape of skills laboratory (lab) courses and faculty workload across United States schools and colleges of pharmacy (S/COP). METHODS: The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Laboratory Instructors Special Interest Group disseminated an anonymous questionnaire to collect faculty demographics, skills lab format, faculty workload, and job satisfaction. Descriptive statistics were generated, and paired t-tests were used to assess changes before and during COVID-19. RESULTS: Faculty from 44 of 142 S/COP responded. Participants (n = 45) were more frequently assistant professors (49%), non-tenure track (80%), and female (98%). A mean of 103 students per class, with a mean of two lab courses in both the first and second years and 1.6 in the third year were reported. Courses had a mean 1.6 lab coordinators each. Many institutions leverage non-lab faculty, pharmacy volunteers, post-graduate trainees, and senior professional students to assist. Faculty reported a mean 28.2 hours per week related to lab activities. The mean assigned percent effort was 44% for teaching in the skills lab, demonstrating consistency with effort calculations. Job satisfaction (scale 1-10) decreased from 7.6 before COVID-19 to 6.4 during COVID-19 (P < .01), with satisfaction specifically with their lab role decreasing from 7.5 to 6.6 (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Skills lab faculty reported significant time coordinating labs and identified the need for additional support. S/COP should ensure appropriate personnel resources are available to provide quality clinical skills training.

Implementation of longitudinal thematic course design across four institutions.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to describe thematic course design utilized in pharmacy courses at four different institutions. Best practices and lessons learned are shared. METHODS: Four institutions independently incorporated a longitudinal Harry Potter (HP) theme into their courses. Faculty collaborated to share course experiences and determine similar concepts present at all four institutions. A mixed-methods approach was used to analyze available data. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative course evaluation comments. Quantitative course evaluation data from two institutions was also analyzed. RESULTS: Similar concepts identified as important elements of longitudinal thematic course design included creation of new groups, incorporation of thematic activities (e.g., adding HP characters to patient cases), and gamification. Qualitative analysis of student course evaluation comments found three emerging themes: increased student engagement, enjoyment of thematic course design, and appreciation for the gaming aspect. Quantitative course evaluation data demonstrated that students liked the HP theme to facilitate learning and it increased student engagement in the course. CONCLUSIONS: A thematic course design at four institutions was well received by students and potentially increased student engagement with the course material longitudinally.

Curriculum mapping of accredited pharmacy programs in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: No current guidance exists to inform the content area credit hours for doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) programs in the United States (US). METHODS: Public websites were accessed for all Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) accredited PharmD programs in the US to record the credit hours devoted to drug therapy, clinical skills, experiential learning, scholarship, social and administrative sciences, physiology/pathophysiology, pharmacogenomics, medicinal chemistry, pharmacology, pharmaceutics, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in the didactic curricula. Due to the high prevalence of programs that integrate drug therapy, pharmacology, and medicinal chemistry into a single course, we subdivided programs based upon whether drug therapy courses were "integrated" or "non-integrated." A regression analyses was conducted to explore the relationship between each content area and North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) pass rates and residency match rates. RESULTS: Data were available for 140 accredited PharmD programs. Drug therapy had the highest credit hours in programs with both integrated and non-integrated drug therapy courses. Programs with integrated drug therapy courses had significantly more credit hours in experiential and scholarship and fewer credit hours in stand-alone courses for pathophysiology, medicinal chemistry, and pharmacology. Credit hours in content areas did not predict NAPLEX pass rate nor residency match success rate. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive description of all ACPE accredited pharmacy schools with credit hours broken down by content areas. While content areas did not directly predict success criteria, these results may still be useful to describe curricular norms or inform the design of future pharmacy curricula.

A Four-day Pharmacy Course Schedule.

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the results of implementing a 4-day student didactic course schedule. METHODS: The change from a 5-day to a 4-day course schedule was implemented in spring 2021. Students in the classes of 2023 and 2024 and faculty course coordinators were surveyed in fall 2021 regarding their experience with the new schedule format. Baseline data from fall 2020 were also collected for comparison. Quantitative data was described using frequencies, percentages, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals. Open-ended questions were evaluated using qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Almost all students (n = 193, 97%) who responded to the course planning survey in fall 2021 wanted to continue the 4-day course schedule. Students perceived the benefits of the 4-day schedule, to include more time for studying/preparing for classes (69%), and for self-care and wellness activities (20%). Student survey responses showed increased odds of engagement outside of the class. Qualitative analysis found that students reported increased engagement and liked the improved course structure. Students disliked the longer time spent in class. Academic performance was reported as somewhat or significantly improved by 85% of respondents. Faculty (n = 31; response rate 80%) reported that the 4-day course schedule positively impacted (48%) or had no impact (42%) on their job responsibilities. Work-life balance (87%) was noted as the most positive effect from faculty respondents. CONCLUSION: A 4-day course schedule was well received by both students and faculty. Institutions may consider a similar approach to allow students the flexibility of this novel schedule so as to have more time to prepare for class and wellness activities.

Residents' assessment of mentoring received on lecture performance in a teaching and learning curriculum program.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated residents' assessment of the mentorship received and how it impacted lecture performance as part of a teaching and learning curriculum (TLC) program. METHODS: An anonymous survey was emailed to residents completing the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy's TLC during 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. The survey collected information about: the type of mentorship received, residents' self-perceived lecture performance, and residents' desire to be involved in academia post-residency. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Fisher's exact tests investigated the association between residents' self-perceived lecture enhancement due to mentorship and: mentors' involvement, residents' confidence in understanding the lecture topic, mentors' affiliation with VCU, and semester when the lecture occurred. Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Forty-two of 86 residents (48.8%) completed the survey. Residents who were part of the TLC but did not deliver a lecture (n = 7) or taught practitioners instead of students (n =  2) were excluded, resulting in 33 participants. The majority of residents (87.9%) agreed or strongly agreed that mentorship enhanced their lecture. Mentors' level of involvement was significantly associated with residents' perception that the mentorship they received enhanced their lecture (P < .008). Residents' confidence in understanding the lecture topic, mentor affiliation, and semester when the lecture occurred were not associated with residents' self-perceived lecture enhancement due to mentorship. CONCLUSIONS: Active mentorship was associated with better self-perceived lecture performance. The best criteria for lecture mentorship should be established in the future to help prepare residents to give lectures.

Retention of students' knowledge of immunizations following a one-day or a five-week course.

INTRODUCTION: The American Pharmacists Association (APhA) Pharmacy-Based Immunization Delivery Certificate Program is commonly used by schools of pharmacy to train student pharmacists in immunizations. This study compared student pharmacists' knowledge retention of immunization content when the live seminar of the APhA Program was delivered as a one-day co-curricular activity or as a five-week required course. The impact of immunization experience on students' knowledge retention was a secondary objective. METHODS: A 45-question knowledge assessment about immunizations was administered to second and third-year student pharmacists eight months after completing either a five-week course (second-year students) or a one-day seminar (third-year students). Students were also asked about their experience providing patient education, screening, and administering immunizations. RESULTS: Knowledge assessment scores declined by an average of 26.3% from the initial to the eight-month assessment, and declines were similar for second and third-year students. However, students who reported immunizing over 50 patients had significantly higher knowledge retention than those who reported never immunizing. CONCLUSIONS: A live immunization training given over one day or five weeks did not impact the retention of immunization knowledge eight months later. However, students who immunized >50 patients had greater knowledge retention. These findings indicate the importance of including the application of immunization knowledge in pharmacy curricula to enhance long-term knowledge retention.

An intensive summer pipeline program for pre-pharmacy students to increase underrepresented minority matriculation to pharmacy school.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe the Summer Academic Enrichment Program (SAEP) for underrepresented minority (URM) matriculants at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: The SAEP is a six-week summer pipeline program at VCU for undergraduate and post-baccalaureate students interested in applying to medical, dental, physical therapy, or pharmacy school, divided into school tracks. Demographic and matriculation information about the pharmacy track program participants was obtained from the program and school administration from inception in 2012 through 2019. A retrospective analysis of the impact of SAEP on URM matriculation at VCU School of Pharmacy was conducted. FINDINGS: Of the 80 pharmacy track participants, 56.3% (n = 45) have enrolled at VCU School of Pharmacy. Among those 45 that matriculated, 33.3% (n = 15) identified as one or more of the following URM populations: Black or African American 28.9% (n = 13), Hispanic or Latinx 4.4% (n = 2), and American Indian 2.2% (n = 1). In comparison, the same URM classifications for students enrolled at VCU School of Pharmacy over the last nine years ranged from 5% to 11% Black or African American, 0% to 5% Hispanic or Latinx, and 0% to 2% American Indian with a total URM representation range of 7% to 25% during this timeframe. SUMMARY: SAEP is a program utilized to increase matriculation of students from diverse backgrounds, including URM populations. This type of pipeline program is described as one way to improve URM representation.

A classroom-based patient case activity as a potential formative indicator of pre-advanced pharmacy practice experience readiness.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pharmacy programs must assess student readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). This study evaluated: (1) if a relationship exists between student performance on a classroom-based patient case activity (Rx Review) and (2) performance on direct patient care and perceptions of the transferability of Rx Reviews to the APPE setting. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Rx Reviews are timed, independent, prospective reviews of a patient's medical record intended to simulate pre-rounding activities common in acute and ambulatory care settings. Students complete 12 Rx Reviews across a skills laboratory course sequence. Rx Review scores were compared to performance on acute care and ambulatory care APPEs for students in the Class of 2019 using descriptive statistics for student scores and bivariate logistic regression for the association between Rx Review scores and performance outcomes on patient care APPEs. Student perceptions of the Rx Reviews were assessed through a survey. Descriptive statistics and qualitative responses were used to analyze responses to the multiple-choice survey questions and open-ended question, respectively. FINDINGS: One hundred twenty-two students participated in the study. A relationship was found between students' Rx Review scores and performance in certain direct patient care APPEs, with students performing in the bottom 50% on Rx Reviews being more likely to perform poorly on those APPEs. Over 93% of students identified Rx Reviews as at least somewhat helpful in preparing them for APPEs. SUMMARY: This study indicated that a classroom-based patient case activity could be used as a formative measure of APPE readiness.

Introducing LGBTQIA+ Patient Care to Pharmacy Students Through Laboratory-Based Exercises.

Objective. To assess the impact of novel skills-based laboratory exercises on first-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students' confidence and knowledge regarding care for people identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other (LGBTQIA+).Methods. An LGBTQIA+ lecture discussing pronouns, common terminology, health disparities, health screenings, and gender-affirming hormone therapy was presented to students. During laboratory sessions, students applied lecture topics via a learning level-specific activity. Students completed a pre- and post-activity survey assessing their knowledge, confidence, and activity experience.Results. Seventy-nine students (N=348) completed both the pre- and post-activity survey. Students' overall increase in knowledge scores was significant, with improvement in four out of six questions among each cohort. A significant increase was seen in students understanding of the role of the pharmacist, their confidence in caring for LGBTQIA+ patients, and their comfort with using appropriate terminology. Most students (92%) agreed or strongly agreed that learning about LGBTQIA+ patient care was a positive experience, while 74% agreed that additional education on LGBTQIA+ patients is needed within their pharmacy curriculum.Conclusion. After a brief skills-based laboratory course, students' knowledge and confidence in caring for LGBTQIA+ patients improved; however, students agreed that more exposure was necessary. Future studies will follow students as they progress through the curriculum to determine the impact of exposure to LGBTQIA+ content across all three didactic years.

Insurance Adjudication Simulation Across Multiple Institutions and Levels of Learners.

Objective. A virtual educational innovation was designed and implemented to have student pharmacists simulate insurance processing. This article describes the impact of this third-party payer simulation on student knowledge and confidence and reports student perceptions of the activity.Methods. First-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students (P1, P2, and P3 students, respectively) at four institutions completed the self-paced simulation. Knowledge was assessed by comparing results of multiple-choice questions on the pre- and post-assessments and evaluated by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Confidence was assessed by students' change in self-reported confidence scale measurements and compared using the chi-square test.Results. The simulation had a significant impact on student knowledge. The largest improvement was in P1 students, with a pre- to post-assessment average score difference (scale 0-100) of 16.6 compared to 7.2 for P2 and 10.2 for P3 students. Significant improvement was seen on most of the knowledge questions, with variations for certain questions between groups. All groups had significantly improved self-rated confidence in their abilities. Most students agreed that they would recommend this activity to other students (91.7%) and that it encouraged them to think about the material in a new way (85%).Conclusions. Through an innovative simulation on prescription insurance processing, positive results were seen across all three levels of learners. Knowledge assessments significantly improved, and student confidence increased across all groups and all confidence items. Participants would recommend this activity to other students and felt it was an effective way to learn about insurance adjudication.

Evaluation of students' knowledge, values, and experiences in a geriatrics interprofessional practice-based model.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The objective was to evaluate (1) students' knowledge in a variety of geriatrics competencies, (2) students' attitudes toward the value of interprofessional practice, and (3) pharmacy students' experiences after an advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) in a practice-based interprofessional education (IPE) model. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Nursing, pharmacy, social work, and health sciences programs who participated in the Richmond Health and Wellness Program (RHWP) interprofessional experience received pre- and post-surveys to assess changes in geriatrics knowledge. An adapted Attitude Toward Health Care Teams Scale (ATHCTS) was used to assess changes in students' attitudes toward the value of interprofessional teamwork. Finally, representative quotes were taken from APPE evaluations to illustrate the pharmacy student experience. FINDINGS: Seventy-two out of 82 (87.8%) interprofessional students who participated in the practice-based IPE model at RHWP in the fall 2018 participated in this study. Geriatrics knowledge scores significantly increased by 4.03 (P < .001) with a significant change in some knowledge domains: frailty (P = .005) and medication knowledge (P = .017). Attitudes toward the value of interprofessional practice increased with a statistically significant difference in the ATHCTS quality of care subscale (P < .001). Pharmacy students found the interprofessional collaboration to be valuable. SUMMARY: A practice-based IPE experience can provide many benefits to health professional students. By working as a team, students learn from each other, leading to increased knowledge on several geriatrics competencies. Students understand the importance of IPE experiences, but their attitudes become more positive through application.

Alumni survey of a combined doctor of pharmacy/graduate certificate in aging studies program.

INTRODUCTION: The Certificate in Aging Studies at Virginia Commonwealth University allows students to study gerontology while completing their doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) or graduate pharmaceutical sciences degree concurrently. The objective of the study was to evaluate alumni satisfaction with the Certificate in Aging Studies program, its application, and its perceived usefulness. METHODS: Alumni of the program (n = 49) were emailed an anonymous electronic survey about their perceptions of the program. The survey was emailed three times. Responses to eight multiple choice questions were summarized using descriptive statistics. Two free response questions were qualitatively analyzed for themes by two investigators. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 59.2% (n = 29). Most respondents practice in hospital settings (24.1%) and did not undertake additional postgraduate clinical training (44.8%) or earn additional geriatric certifications (69%). The majority (65.5%) reported using the dual program in their career and would recommend the Certificate in Aging Studies to others (96.6%). Most (59%) alumni indicated that the best part of the program was the interprofessional interaction, and 69% suggested no further areas of improvement for the program. CONCLUSIONS: A PharmD-Gerontology dual program is one way to enhance the workforce to care for the growing older population. This partnership approach should be considered by schools of pharmacy that also offer degree programs in gerontology.

A Modified Delphi Involving Laboratory Faculty to Define Essential Skills for Pharmacy Graduates.

Objective. To define essential skills for Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) graduates that are needed in the four most common sectors of pharmacy practice as determined by expert faculty who instruct within pharmacy skills laboratories.Methods. A three-round Delphi method was used to establish consensus. In the first round, participants were asked what skills were needed by students at entry to practice in community, health-system, ambulatory care, and managed care pharmacy settings. In rounds two and three, participants were asked to rate each skill with a level of importance using a 10-point Likert scale (1=not important to 10=very important).Results. In round one, participants produced a collective list of 289 essential skills. These skill statements were sent to participants in rounds two and three to assign a level of importance. After the third round, participants reached consensus using a mean level of importance for a final list of 69 community pharmacy skills, 47 health-system, 60 ambulatory care, and 15 managed care skills. These skills were then mapped to entrustable professional activities domains for schools and colleges pharmacy to use as a resource when assessing core competency development in the curriculum.Conclusion. The Delphi technique was used successfully with expert pharmacy skills laboratory faculty to identify laboratory-focused essential skills that recent PharmD graduates should have prior to entering community, health-system, ambulatory care, or managed care pharmacy practice. These essential skills can be used to guide curriculum development, develop milestone markers, and help ensure students are practice ready.

CMS Mega-Rule Update and the Status of Pharmacy-Related Deficiencies in Nursing Homes.

The scope, frequency, and nursing home characteristics associated with pharmacy-related deficiency citations following the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2016 "Mega-Rule" update are described. A retrospective analysis of data from Nursing Home Compare and LTCfocus.org was conducted on pharmacy-related deficiencies (including pharmacy services, drug regimen review, unnecessary medications, medication errors, and labeling/storage). The most commonly cited pharmacy-related deficiencies (N = 11,678) were related to labeling/storage (comprising 25.1% of pharmacy-related deficiencies), unnecessary psychotropic medications (20.5%), and routine pharmacy services (16.8%). In multivariable analysis, nursing home characteristics significantly associated with receiving any pharmacy-related deficiency included less geographic competition (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.68), registered nurse hours (aOR: 0.66), occupancy (aOR: 0.67), for-profit status (aOR: 1.27), and Midwest (aOR: 1.50) or West (aOR: 2.95) location. Given the frequency of pharmacy-related citations and the lack of standardization in pharmacists' roles in nursing homes, further research is needed to better understand how pharmacist services can affect inspection compliance.

Changes in student pharmacists' confidence in attaining geriatrics competencies and attitudes toward older adults across the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum.

To determine if student pharmacists' confidence in their knowledge and skills, and their attitudes toward older adults improved throughout pharmacy school with an integrated geriatrics didactic curriculum (years 1-3) and a final year of clinical training including a required advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) in geriatrics (year 4). A two-part voluntary anonymous survey was administered at three different time points to two large cohorts of student pharmacists. The first part of the survey assessed students' confidence in attaining geriatrics competencies. The second part of the survey used the UCLA Geriatrics Attitudes Scale to assess students' attitudes. Of the 286 students who were emailed the survey, 236 student pharmacists completed it at the first assessment. Student pharmacists showed an increase in confidence in achieving geriatrics competencies from their first year to their third year, and further increase after their clinical training. Most students also held a generally positive attitude toward older adults from P1 to P4 year. Integration of geriatrics throughout the didactic and experiential curriculum made an impact on student pharmacists' confidence in their competency toward caring for older adults, while maintaining a positive attitude toward older adults throughout pharmacy school.